Budget before launch
Estimate support chatbot, RAG, coding agent, summarization, and classification costs before you commit to a provider or model tier.
Estimate the cost of GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Llama, and Mistral API workloads. Compare input, output, cached prompt, batch, monthly, yearly, and blended token costs in one place.
| Model | Input | Output | Request | Day | Month | Year | Blended / 1M | Cache saved | Context used |
|---|
Estimate support chatbot, RAG, coding agent, summarization, and classification costs before you commit to a provider or model tier.
Input and output tokens often have different prices. Blended cost shows the effective price for your actual ratio, not a generic model headline price.
Repeated system prompts, policies, examples, and reference material can qualify for cached input rates on some providers. Use the cache slider to test the savings.
The table flags how much of each model's context window your request uses, so you can avoid oversized prompts or choose a larger-context model.
These calculations use local pricing metadata so the page works offline. Always verify the exact model, region, caching rules, batch discounts, and long-context thresholds on official provider pages before relying on estimates.
A token is the billing unit most LLM APIs use. It can be a word, word fragment, punctuation mark, or code symbol.
Output tokens require the provider to run the model while generating each response. That serving cost is often higher than reading input.
Cached input pricing is a lower rate for repeated prompt content that the provider can reuse. It is useful for long system prompts, examples, policy text, and repeated reference material.
Blended cost combines input, cached input, and output token prices into one effective price for your entered workload.
The formulas are exact for the local prices, but provider pricing changes. Treat results as planning estimates and verify official pricing before production decisions.
LLM cost is estimated from input tokens, output tokens, request volume, and the selected model price. This section gives visitors enough context to understand the calculation, choose the right inputs, and decide whether the result is suitable for a rough estimate, a worksheet answer, or a planning discussion.
Choose the model, enter average input and output tokens, add requests per day or month, then compare the projected total with a cheaper or smaller-context alternative. The important habit is to keep every input on the same basis before comparing results. For example, do not mix hours with minutes, grams with kilograms, square feet with square meters, or apparent power with real power unless the calculator explicitly converts those units.
If a workflow sends 2,000 input tokens and receives 500 output tokens per request, multiply both values by request count and apply the model's input and output token rates separately. This kind of small example is useful because it makes the direction of the calculation clear. After the result looks sensible, replace the sample numbers with your real project, class, recipe, prompt, or equipment data.
Use LLM API Cost Calculator for API budgeting, SaaS feature planning, chatbot estimates, batch summarization costs, and model switching decisions. It is also helpful when you need a fast second opinion before copying numbers into a spreadsheet, invoice, lab note, design brief, homework solution, or project estimate.
The most common errors are entering the right number in the wrong unit, forgetting a multiplier such as 1,000, using a default rate that does not match your location, or treating an estimate as a certified result. If the answer seems surprisingly high or low, halve or double one input and see whether the output changes in the expected direction. That simple sensitivity check helps visitors trust the tool and understand the relationship between inputs and results.
For learning, planning, and quick comparisons, yes. For compliance, contracts, tax filing, health decisions, or electrical work, treat the result as a starting point and verify it against official guidance or a qualified professional.
Differences usually come from rounding, default assumptions, unit conversions, or whether the tool includes optional factors. Check the formula, input units, and rounding method before deciding which result is more appropriate.